For software houses
Estimates your client can trust, without a 40-page PDF
Software estimates lose on ambiguity, not on price. The proposal states scope, assumptions and what happens when requirements change.
Between the discovery call and the SOW there's a proposal that has to defend a six-figure estimate. Proposals turns scope, phases and assumptions into a page the whole buying committee can actually read.
14 days free · full features · no card required
In short
- An estimate is read by an engineer and by a budget holder — one looks for assumptions, the other for risk.
- Explicit assumptions and scope boundaries are cheaper in a proposal than in a change order.
- Phases with outcomes read better than a list of technologies the client is not buying.
- The draft is built from the discovery transcript, so requirements are not transcribed a third time.
- You can see when the proposal reaches the CTO — a return visit from a new context usually means exactly that.
6–10
Why technical quotes lose deals
01
The estimate reads as a black box
The client sees a big number and a feature table. They don't see the assumptions, the phasing, the reasons, so they push back on the only thing visible: price.
02
Proposal by copy-paste
Last project's SOW, a new logo, the old client's name still in paragraph four. Every shortcut shows exactly where trust matters most.
03
The committee reads it without you
CTO, CFO, product, each reads a different section, none of them with you on a call. You never learn which section killed the deal.
01 · Scope
Assumptions on the page, not in your head
The proposal lays out scope as phases with explicit assumptions and dependencies. What's included, what's not, what depends on the client, visible before the price, so the estimate has a spine.
- Phased scope with timelines
- Assumptions and exclusions made explicit
- Every claim traceable to the call or marked as an assumption
02 · Pricing
Defend the estimate before they attack it
Options, fixed scope, phased start, discovery-first, with a recommended variant and the reasoning next to the number. The FAQ preempts the committee's objections, because it's built from your call.
- Staged options with a recommended entry
- Reasoning presented next to the number
- Objection-based FAQ for the readers you'll never meet
03 · Committee
See which stakeholder is stuck where
The proposal is one link, so you see when it's forwarded, which sections get attention and where reading stops. Follow up on the section that's actually blocking, before their internal meeting, not after.
- Forwarding and multi-reader signals
- Section-level attention
- Follow-up drafts aimed at the sticking point
Software houses ask
Built for teams like yours
Updated: August 12, 2026